Search |
[Next Page] |
Fill in the missing stamps!!! Let us suppose the crooked stamp dealer has a stock of 10,000 mint issues. He sells 1000 of these th ... |
12/27/2005 at 23:05 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Fill in the missing stamps!!! The basic stamp was a typograph printing. You can see the raised design on the back of mint issues. ... |
12/26/2005 at 23:50 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries? Yes, enlighten us, expand our horizons, please. |
12/10/2005 at 21:49 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Tatarstan gave birth first real "Russian locals" Your English is fine!
If and when you obtain such a cover, would you share it with us?
I am sure ... |
12/6/2005 at 20:05 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Tatarstan gave birth first real "Russian locals" Is there any information concerning the U.P.U. recognizing Tatarstan's status on these for internati ... |
12/5/2005 at 23:29 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
"Once you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." Venets, you can click on this link to find Dr. R.J. Ceresa's email
address:
http://www.rossica.o ... |
11/29/2005 at 19:44 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not? Soaking a stamp in water isn't the only way to remove it
from the cover.
High humidity, lighter ... |
11/29/2005 at 12:13 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not? Bill,
If the ink is water soluable (a thinner, more fluid ink), would you be inclined to say that ... |
11/26/2005 at 22:13 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Postmark question Thanks Gary! My Tridents appriciate it as well. |
11/25/2005 at 23:55 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not? A couple of thoughts and questions.
As Venets said earlier, the overprint appears under the postm ... |
11/25/2005 at 23:42 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Zero? Thoughts? Comments? |
11/25/2005 at 10:15 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Not a one |
11/25/2005 at 10:14 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not? IMHO, I believe the year will come out as "07".
I also think there is enough postmark to even get ... |
11/24/2005 at 08:39 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Minkus 1969 Digging out some older catalogs I found the following footnote in the Minkus New 1969 World Wide Sta ... |
11/24/2005 at 08:06 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Postmark question Shown below is a Kharkov substation "3" postmark. It is the clearest of the three on the envelope. O ... |
11/23/2005 at 20:34 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries? Igor!
Please feel free to post any of the above forgeries to the forgery section. I personally wo ... |
11/23/2005 at 19:50 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not? My first questions would be:
Why would the Foriegn Office need to overprint stamps locally, especia ... |
11/23/2005 at 00:23 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries? I guess I'm the only one in this Society that ever questions a stamp's legitamacy.
Not one postin ... |
11/22/2005 at 23:29 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Everyone loves a price list For those of you that can't read Russian, Rossica once upon a time offered stamp price lists like th ... |
11/22/2005 at 22:48 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 4 kop. Also look at the "A" 's right leg. Looks to me like it is too wide. |
12/3/2004 at 21:26 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 4 kop. That we need more examples, Please? |
12/3/2004 at 21:23 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Another donated image....... This is the back of the 20k/5Rub overprint. I think this is an extreme example of the oily residue, ... |
12/3/2004 at 08:24 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk revealed? HUH? Ya, right...... Alas these remain a mystery. |
12/2/2004 at 23:39 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
If you want to buy the Nikolaevsk stamps.... Neither are accurate scans of the colour, my fault. I'll redo the stamp when it returns from being e ... |
12/2/2004 at 23:37 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 15 kop. Agree!
Everything is too perfect. I smell a laser burning..... |
12/2/2004 at 23:31 by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
[Next Page] |