| Search |
| [Next Page] |
Fill in the missing stamps!!!
Let us suppose the crooked stamp dealer has a stock of 10,000 mint issues. He sells 1000 of these th ... |
12/27/2005 at 23:05
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Fill in the missing stamps!!!
The basic stamp was a typograph printing. You can see the raised design on the back of mint issues. ... |
12/26/2005 at 23:50
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries?
Yes, enlighten us, expand our horizons, please. |
12/10/2005 at 21:49
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Tatarstan gave birth first real "Russian locals"
Your English is fine!
If and when you obtain such a cover, would you share it with us?
I am sure ... |
12/6/2005 at 20:05
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Tatarstan gave birth first real "Russian locals"
Is there any information concerning the U.P.U. recognizing Tatarstan's status on these for internati ... |
12/5/2005 at 23:29
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
"Once you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Venets, you can click on this link to find Dr. R.J. Ceresa's email
address:
http://www.rossica.o ... |
11/29/2005 at 19:44
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not?
Soaking a stamp in water isn't the only way to remove it
from the cover.
High humidity, lighter ... |
11/29/2005 at 12:13
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not?
Bill,
If the ink is water soluable (a thinner, more fluid ink), would you be inclined to say that ... |
11/26/2005 at 22:13
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Postmark question
Thanks Gary! My Tridents appriciate it as well. |
11/25/2005 at 23:55
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not?
A couple of thoughts and questions.
As Venets said earlier, the overprint appears under the postm ... |
11/25/2005 at 23:42
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Zero?
Thoughts? Comments? |
11/25/2005 at 10:15
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Not a one
|
11/25/2005 at 10:14
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not?
IMHO, I believe the year will come out as "07".
I also think there is enough postmark to even get ... |
11/24/2005 at 08:39
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Minkus 1969
Digging out some older catalogs I found the following footnote in the Minkus New 1969 World Wide Sta ... |
11/24/2005 at 08:06
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Postmark question
Shown below is a Kharkov substation "3" postmark. It is the clearest of the three on the envelope. O ... |
11/23/2005 at 20:34
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries?
Igor!
Please feel free to post any of the above forgeries to the forgery section. I personally wo ... |
11/23/2005 at 19:50
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Forgery or Not?
My first questions would be:
Why would the Foriegn Office need to overprint stamps locally, especia ... |
11/23/2005 at 00:23
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
No more forgeries?
I guess I'm the only one in this Society that ever questions a stamp's legitamacy.
Not one postin ... |
11/22/2005 at 23:29
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Everyone loves a price list
For those of you that can't read Russian, Rossica once upon a time offered stamp price lists like th ... |
11/22/2005 at 22:48
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 4 kop.
Also look at the "A" 's right leg. Looks to me like it is too wide. |
12/3/2004 at 21:26
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 4 kop.
That we need more examples, Please?  |
12/3/2004 at 21:23
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Another donated image.......
This is the back of the 20k/5Rub overprint. I think this is an extreme example of the oily residue, ... |
12/3/2004 at 08:24
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk revealed? HUH? Ya, right......
Alas these remain a mystery. |
12/2/2004 at 23:39
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
If you want to buy the Nikolaevsk stamps....
Neither are accurate scans of the colour, my fault. I'll redo the stamp when it returns from being e ... |
12/2/2004 at 23:37
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
Nikolaevsk 15 kop.
Agree!
Everything is too perfect. I smell a laser burning..... |
12/2/2004 at 23:31
by: MICHAEL MACKENZIE |
| [Next Page] |
