oldteddy
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 237
Registered: 12/31/2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Perplexed
|
|
Scott #122 - different paper?
Two stamps are shown on the scan below - a "normal" 4-kop and one that appears on much thinner transparent paper. Both have vertical grids of chalk
lines. Paper structures are different - see fragments under high resolution (2400 dpi).
|
|
jlechtanski
Moderator
    
Posts: 640
Registered: 7/7/2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood.
|
|
Mayorov does not list any paper variety for the 4k imperf in his catalog. He does, however, list the 4k perf on 0.07 mm paper in used condition only.
As a reference, he values the basic stamp as 1, and the 0.07 mm at 250.
|
|
oldteddy
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 237
Registered: 12/31/2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Perplexed
|
|
Is it possible to get more information about that catalog? Like title, publisher, price, may be a seller it's available from and a short summary of
what is in it in comparison with other catalogs.
|
|
jlechtanski
Moderator
    
Posts: 640
Registered: 7/7/2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood.
|
|
http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/UFDC.aspx?c=ros1&m=hd52&i=1475...
It was being sold by the Canadian Society of Russian Philately as part of their Journal Fund.
http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/UFDC.aspx?c=ros1&m=hd81&i=1475...
Here's the entry from the APS Library: (click on FULL DISPLAY)
http://www.stamps.org/InmagicGenie/opac_report.aspx?ReportNa...
|
|
Unhinged
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 117
Registered: 11/8/2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Suggestion
Quote: Originally posted by oldteddy  | Is it possible to get more information about that catalog? Like title, publisher, price, may be a seller it's available from and a short summary of
what is in it in comparison with other catalogs. |
Would this be something useful to have available on this site? A list of known cataloges and what makes them special. I've seen many different names
bandied about here, but know zero to nothing about any of them, except Scott and Michelin.
Just a thought, in case anyone wants to run with it.
|
|
Jeff
Super Administrator
       
Posts: 265
Registered: 10/18/2002
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's developing...
|
|
Michel - Michelin does maps and tires...
|
|
Unhinged
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 117
Registered: 11/8/2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Oops. So sorry. As they say these days, my bad. Truth be told, I've never actually seen one, so I'm a bit of a tyro even there.
I do have a 1968 Minkus Poland catalog, though. Does that count?
|
|
GregMirsky
Rossica Librarian
       
Posts: 244
Registered: 11/2/2002
Location: Palo Alto,CA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Still Optimistic...
|
|
Actually we have Mayorov catalog in the Rossica library too. It covers varieties of Imperial Russian stamps. Published in the USSR in 1989. Please
contact me directly if you need it.
|
|
David Jay
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 417
Registered: 1/24/2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There are a huge number of varieties for the arms stamps issued from 1917 on, because of the chaotic conditions at the time. Both of these show the
normal vertical weave to the paper (it was horizontal in 1909-1911, vertical from 1912 forward). The thinner paper looks like it got less of a chalk
coating, in addition to being thinner (or perhaps as one of the reasons for its thinness).
|
|
cec71
Major Philatelist
 
Posts: 199
Registered: 1/26/2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Paper thickness of 4K
It is noted the Mayorov catalogue lists the "thin" 4K at 0.70 mm. I measured a number of the 4K used. Most are 0.064 to to 0.068 mm. With a less
precise micrometer precise the 0.068 would be measured at 0.07mm. Possibly the 0.064 could also be measured 0.70. If 0.070 is the unusual "thin
paper" what is the "basic" paper thickness. I doubt I have in my collection only the unusual thin paper stamps. Something does not make sense here!
|
|