cec71
Major Philatelist
Posts: 200
Registered: 1/26/2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
follow up on Scott 87 perforated 11 1/2
Now that I have clarified that the stamp in question has vertical lozenges thus IS Scott 87 or 131 perforated 11 1/2 does anyone have an opinion the
origin of the perforation?
Come on folks with all those views someone must have an opinion!!!!!
|
|
|
Jeff
Super Administrator
Posts: 265
Registered: 10/18/2002
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Member Is Offline
Mood: It's developing...
|
|
I was hoping our Flyspeckers, or Andrey would render an opinion.
|
|
|
Andrey
Major Philatelist
Posts: 98
Registered: 3/17/2003
Location: New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: What is Mood?
|
|
Local perforation known on 1 rub. stamps (I do not remember the size of it), I also saw private (forgery) perforation 11.5 on those stamps.
|
|
|
cec71
Major Philatelist
Posts: 200
Registered: 1/26/2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Scott 81, 11 1/2
Thank you for the reply.......
|
|
|
![[*]](./images/samovar/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
