The Samovar
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: single usage on covers
alqabandi
Peasant





Posts: 1
Registered: 8/20/2017
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 8/20/2017 at 10:10
single usage on covers


Dear members ...

i have been looking into the internet for a while now for any postal item with single franking of the following coat of arms stamps from the imperial period ( 3.5 R - 5 R - 7 R - 10 R ) both with watermarked paper and non watermarked but so far i haven't seen any such item ... so if any member own such item i will appreciate if he can share it here ...

looking forward for your replies :-)

with best regards ...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
David Jay
Major Philatelist
***




Posts: 453
Registered: 1/24/2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10/1/2017 at 20:57
Single frankings


It is hard to find such single-frank items for high values, in either the imperial or Soviet period. The inflation period
has many Ruble frankings, but most are multiple frankings. Finding these in my collection is a bit tricky, in that it is mostly arranged by geographic area and topic (e.g., postage due, RR, St Petersburg RR, etc.) not stamp number. I've attached one image that I found -- a 7.5 R VLP on a money order, sent from Vladivostok to Moskva. Two other points:

1) The ultimate find in this game would be a Sc #39 or 40 (the 3.5 and 7 R without posthorns). These were mostly put on parcel forms that were destroyed, and many used examples are fairly rough. So far as I know, there are no examples on a form or cover, except late philatelic uses that don't count (in my book). I have a #40 used in the correct time period on a small piece of what looks to have been a fabric envelope (for a money sending perhaps), but the piece is not much larger than the stamp.
2) The arms Ruble values are as hard to find in single usages as the Romanov 2-5R, but do not command the same prices.


7pt5R_Franking_smaller.jpg - 348kB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Maxime Citerne
Czarist
**




Posts: 48
Registered: 12/22/2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: Seriously Happy

[*] posted on 10/3/2017 at 13:58




103878_204282_1345109468.jpg - 180kB
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
IvoSteijn
Major Philatelist
***




Posts: 362
Registered: 11/2/2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: philatelic

[*] posted on 10/3/2017 at 23:48


David,
Can you explain the rate on that money order? I may have a suspicious nature but I'm wondering if that 7R stamp was added later.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
howard
Major Philatelist
***




Posts: 156
Registered: 2/6/2003
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood.

[*] posted on 10/4/2017 at 14:41


According to Kaminskii's article on rates, which was published in Soviet Collector (1984), as of 15 Aug. 1917, the fee for transmitting 600 rubles was 3 rubles plus a surcharge for telegraphic transmission of 4 rubles, totaling 7 rubles. So the value of the stamp in this case is accurate.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
IvoSteijn
Major Philatelist
***




Posts: 362
Registered: 11/2/2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: philatelic

[*] posted on 10/4/2017 at 19:46


Nice! Thanks, Howard.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
David Jay
Major Philatelist
***




Posts: 453
Registered: 1/24/2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10/14/2017 at 01:07


Thank you Howard. All I could say is that there is no evidence that anything is amiss.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB 1.9.11
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group
[Queries: 17]